SD: House Judiciary Pass Sex Offender Petition Registry Removal Bill

Source: mykxlg.com 2/27/23

Some sex offenders who committed their crimes out of state could petition to get off the South Dakota state sex offenders list under a bill passed Friday morning by the House Judiciary Committee.

SB 176 would allow an individual taken off an out-of-state sex offender list to petition to be removed from the South Dakota sex offender registry.

It would also allow a person who committed a crime in the other state that was not an offense that would land them on the South Dakota registry to petition to be removed.

Supporters said they wanted to treat all South Dakotans the same.

The measure passed the committee 11 to 2.

Republican Rep. Mike Stevens from Yankton said that under current law, the state’s courts could not remove someone from the list whose sex offense occurred in another state. 

Read the full article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

South Dakota residents: write and call if you want change. Show up in person to hearings. Who else will do it?

Just as in California, we all have to get out of our comfort zones to make lasting change.

No people group has remained silent and seen lasting change.

In my opinion, this is why California’s Tiered Registry must be changed to allow for someone who was convicted in California and who subsequently moved out of California to be able to petition California to be relieved of the requirement to register in California.
While this may seem moot, it really isn’t. This is because more and more states are allowing their out-of-state registrants to be removed off of their own registries IF (and only IF) their state of conviction (which in this case would be California) first allows them off of its registry.
I REALLY wish that ACSOL would acknowledge this and include this in future attempts to change California’s Tiered Registry laws.

This bill was signed into law by Gov. Noem on March 9.